Tuesday, June 28, 2016

The Effect of Mobile Devices on Young Learners

Children Interacting With Tablet Technology. [Photography]. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. 
http://quest.eb.com/search/115_3921293/1/115_3921293/cite
Are mobile devices helpful or detrimental for young children? 

This is a hot topic right now for multiple reasons. Firstly, we all care about our children and want to do what's best for them. Secondly, mobile devices are definitely biased towards receiving good reviews (and profit) for their 'educational' apps; while many parents & professionals unsure of the effects these devices have on their kids can all-too-soon deny any benefits the devices may produce. Thirdly, "research regarding the impact of this portable and instantly accessible source of screen time on learning, behavior, and family dynamics has lagged considerably behind its rate of adoption" (Radesky, Schumacher & Zuckerman, 2015). In other words, there is not sufficient research from this new technology to confidently state the positive and/or negative effects mobile devices on young learners.

I recently read two seemingly opposing articles on this topic:

  1. Researchers: Using an iPad or smartphone can harm a toddler’s learning and social skills
  2. No, research does not say that ‘iPads and smartphones may damage toddlers’ brains’

Here is a summary of the first article (from The Washington Post): 
Mobile devices are becoming more commonly used by young children, which begs the question of whether or not this is a good thing for healthy development. Current information from the journal Pediatrics, shows that although there is little research that has been done related to this topic, there are indeed some negative effects, as well as some positive, that mobile devices can have on the development of children. Mobile devices cannot replace (and may even impede) the skills children develop through real life activities like face-to-face interaction and unstructured playtime.

Here is a summary of the second article (from The Guardian):
The above article is an unprofessional, exaggerated account of the Pediatric journal's information. The Pediatric journal in fact is quite neutral, showing some positive and negative effects mobile devices can have on children, but emphasizing the lack of research to make any conclusive statements on the topic. The above article is just the tip of the iceberg of the kind of "scaremongering" that journalists do with information. There are multiple professional sources that say the opposite as the above article. And finally, more research needs to be done in this area so that opinions can be replaced with research data.

After reading these two articles, I made sure to go to the source of their conflict and read the Pediatric journal site myself. It was quite neutral, stating the little amount of research data that has been conducted, and what can result from certain uses and amounts of mobile devices - positive and negative. The author takes a mostly unbiased perspective, but in conclusion has some recommendations to help families avoid the possible negative effects of their children's use of mobile devices.

Both of the above articles were correct, and used the same primary source, but just had different slants. The first one appeared to be more biased and emphasized the negative effects of mobile devices with children, which could be clearly understood from the title. The second article was more concerned about clearly and objectively articulating information from a primary source than anything else.

What I learned from reading these two articles is that a reader should never take a news article at face value without checking its sources. Titles can and are usually emotionally charged to catch the reader's eye, but can be quite biased or misleading, which I discovered from reading these articles.
The farther information strays from a primary source, the more opinionated and subjective it tends to become. 

So to answer the original question I asked at the beginning of this post - "Are mobile devices helpful or detrimental for young children?" My opinion is that a parent should use common sense, do their homework and research primary data sources on the topic, and then come up with a plan that they feel is a healthy, balanced approach that is best for their child.

Sources

Etchells, P. (2015). No, research does not say that 'iPads and smartphones may damage toddlers' brains. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2015/feb/02/no-research-does-not-say-that-ipads-and-smartphones-may-damage-toddlers-brains

McCoy, T. (2015). Researchers: Using an iPad or smartphone can harm a toddler's learning and social skills. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/02/02/using-an-ipad-or-smartphone-can-harm-a-toddlers-brain-researchers-says/

Radesky, J. S., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2015). Mobile and Interactive Media Use by Young Children: The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown. Pediatrics, 135(1). Retrieved from

8 comments:

  1. Chris,
    I agree that parents should form their own opinions and choose what they feel is best for their child. Some people believe that organic food is best for their child while others are ok with non-organic. Some people believe that nursing is best for babies while others believe formula is the better option. Some people believe that electronics are not ok for their children, while others allow them to have any electronic device they would like. I think all too often we are quick to judge others by their choices. In reality, we should be supportive of each other's choices and try to get through this crazy life together.
    Nichole

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said! We will always have differing opinions, it's time to move on from the disagreements and accept each other's differences.

      Delete
  2. Hi Chris,

    I think that the Guardian makes an important point too about how much fear-mongering can go on, I feel in particular in the states. When I think about it, it is amazing how many news stories I see commercials for the next thing that could be "deadly to your children." As many people have pointed out, if it's so deadly why do we have to wait until after sports on the 11 o'clock news to find out? A lot of articles, videos, stories, etc. today I feel are designed to attract people and create buzz. Now, I'm not wholly against that, companies are entitled to advertise their stories and products, but how much is too much? I feel so terrible for people who read stories that cause them worry, and sometimes even make drastic decisions based on them, only to find a week or a month later that the story was wrong or there really wasn't enough research to prove to point. I'd be interested to see if anyone has made guidelines to help filter these sorts of stories out; I think it would help both students and adults!

    -Tom

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nicely said, Chris! With anything that we use ourselves or with our children, we need to do our homework and complete some research. Obviously within that research will be some bias to sift through, but that's just part of our society. Everyone is going to have a different opinion at some point or another, and sometimes articles and stories are created to force that opinion on others. As adults, it is up to us to be responsible about taking information with a grain of salt and really considering the source behind the article. Also, as educators, we should be introducing our students to proper methods of research just as we practice, instead of believing everything we see on the news or internet.

    -Emily

    ReplyDelete
  4. Chris, I entirely agree that news headlines can overreact with the purpose of getting your attention and an emotional response from the reader. This in itself can cause overreaction that without enough research can unfortunately not always present the facts fairly. In regard to this topic, your discussion of how a parent must conduct research on what they are providing for their child is extremely important in my opinion. Parental educational seems to be a much needed aspect of raising children that could be more supported. With technology being so widespread, clear evidence and guidance would be helpful for parents when trying to determine what is best for their child.

    Thank you,
    -Kevin

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tom, where I’ve started to notice inflated and what I call “biased” titles are in regards to articles about presidential candidates. The actual article is usually a lot tamer than the title itself. I understand that the title catches people’s attention, but if that is the only thing some people read, they will definitely be getting the writer’s slant/bias. As far as guidelines, I think that is a good idea, but would be wary of it coming from the government because of fear of losing our freedom of speech - even if the people sharing information are incorrect.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Emily, I think your last comment about introducing our students to proper methods of research is vital! If we don't teach them to differentiate between fact and opinion, they could definitely be taken advantage of in our commercialized world.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kevin, speaking of parental education, I wish that there was a college class I could have taken on how to raise kids!! I think that 3 of the most useful classes a high school/college/university could offer are "Marriage," "Raising Kids," and "Personal Money Management." :)

    ReplyDelete